Archive for the ‘Questions’ Category

Monday, May 13th, 2013

Bald Cats, Putin, Homer and Algorithms

“Read Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey and try and figure out why they’re still being read, searched for, turned into movies or (digibabble) digital video content.”

The above was my reply to a question I was asked on a recent panel about what young creative types should do today to better prepare themselves for success in our world. And, while it might seem a bit facetious…it’s not meant to be – not in the slightest.  Frankly, if you think the answer is to learn social media/technology, you will fail – unless you understand why people share and why it is that some things share better than others.

BuzzFeed, for example, can talk all they want about their algorithm, but at the end of the day their young and savvy editors find the cat pictures, create the lists and recognize the news items they instinctively know will zoom from person to person – which in my book makes them that much more powerful and a true example of Digital Exponential, and that is the point.

Yet, sadly, it’s still only the holy algorithm that analysts and the digibablers want to worship. Because in their zeal to monetize, just how exciting is a story about hungry-smart editors versus the grail search for software that eliminates the human element?

The joke is that they abandon the latest greatest for the next as soon as the quarterly earnings don’t match their initial rave predictions, and of course Facebook, Groupon and LinkedIn are casualties of this fickle market – although while Facebook and LinkedIn are real, Groupon was a complete fabrication of the digibable financial set who perhaps one day will be called to task for misleading the public.

And more and more, the market leaders are turning to the need for human insight and interaction in order to better their products – sales – and earnings.

Bottom line – learn – learn from the greats. Don’t fall into the conceit that the fabulous technology we have today has created a revolution in human behavior.  Understand, rather, that it’s an amazing evolution in terms of what we can do and achieve in leveraging and enhancing exponentially our core human values and needs.

I share with you a conversation between Rudyard Kipling and Mark Twain (two of my favorites) that took place in Elmira, New York, in June of 1889.

“The two men discuss the difficulties of copyright before moving on to Twain’s work. ‘Growing bold, and feeling that I had a few hundred thousand folk at my back, I demanded whether Tom Sawyer married Judge Thatcher’s daughter and whether we were ever going to hear of Tom Sawyer as a man.’

Twain gets up, fills his pipe, and paces the room in his bedroom slippers. ‘I haven’t decided. I have a notion of writing the sequel to Tom Sawyer in two ways. In one I would make him rise to great honor and go to Congress, and in the other I should hang him. Then the friends and enemies of the book could take their choice.’

Kipling raises a voice of protest: to him, Tom Sawyer is real.”

Source: Hello/Goodbye/Hello by Craig Brown

This conversation could have happened today – copyright issues, crowd sourcing, social media extensions…but it didn’t and that is the point.

But allow me to end with Kipling’s final thought, which I believe brings us back to Homer, The Bible…all the great and living ideas and thoughts that will last way after the latest iteration of Bald Cats that look like Putin will be gone and forgotten…and by the way, I’m not knocking that—just making a point….

Listen:

“‘Yes; but don’t give him two joggles and show the result, because he isn’t your property any more. He belongs to us.’” Kipling to Twain

And there you have it…it always belongs to us – once the genie leaves the bottle, it can never be put back in. And that is the secret – not the software, not the technology, not all the digibable in the world….

So Bing Homer (the original, not Simpson) – and ask yourself why – and by the way, spend a few minutes with Twain and Kipling too.

What do you think?

 

Monday, May 6th, 2013

The Race to be Wrong — Is it Right??

reddit, its (r)editors and “old-fashioned” media channels all took negative hits during the recent tragic Boston bombing and its frantic aftermath.

Interestingly enough, if you cut through the digibabble and pontificating punditry, the issue is actually the same – the need we have to provide the scoop – to be the first – to have the 15 minutes or 15mgs of fame as the source of information that everyone wants but no one yet knows.

Some would say that the CNN and other broadcast news problem is the need to fill 24 hours of airtime with meaningful content – while the digital issue is how to verify the source when torrents of information assault the system.

Stay with me here – cut through the crap and there is no difference. In both instances we have a need to communicate, a need to share, a need to be first, a need to own what no one else has.

In both instances – unverified information from sketchy sources caused bad, wrong, invalid and in some instances hurtful information to be shared. In both instances we distributed “onwards misinformation” – WOM – digital and analog perpetuated the problem and in the end – an old guy who noticed blood on his boat cracked the case.

Bottom line – the power of digital communication and digital sharing is akin to wearing Iron Man’s power suit. It takes our human need and behavior…exponentially increases it, and at its best opens up new and exciting opportunities for problem solving – in fact, that is the true promise of reddit – and it works.

The mistake is to think that the reddit blow up in any way denigrates what they can do or that the mindless chatter we saw on CNN and other broadcast channels in any way denigrates what they do. (Jon Stewart’s take on this is a must see.)

And finally, read up on Dewey-Truman – you know my view – connecting the dots backwards propels us forwards….

At the end of the day…no one person or channel or anything has a total and complete lock on veracity…listen:

“No one can be right all of the time, but it helps to be right most of the time.”
Robert Half

And there you have it. We need to stop making excuses.  Lose the digibabble and figure out how to better vet our incredibly expanded and expanding range of sources. If we don’t? Dewey-Truman will haunt us – exponentially….

What do you think?

 

 

  • Following the thread from Graham, Reuters pursue the mantra 'fastest and most accurate', but following this mantra lead them to be swamped by Bloomberg and other news sources who provide 'opinion', which is taking the facts plus the journalists POV to deliver more column inches, therefore publishing slanted coverage, which can easily become inaccurate as a story breaks and morphs ...
  • BBC News and Journalism were an old client of mine and pride themselves on being the news source that will only publish a news piece once it has been validated by three separate sources. It let Sky News own the 'fastest' position but for a public service striving to deliver 'World Class Journalism' integrity of the story outweighed speed ...
Monday, April 29th, 2013

The Future Rests on Legacy

How important is the past to you?

Is everything that was…all that happened…just mere history…dinosaur doings?

Do you subscribe to the notion that nothing that is old is worth knowing and that only the new – the bright and shiny – is valuable?

Frankly, this week I became obsessed with this notion as the company I work for left its office space of 87 years and moved.

Truth is, our building has been outdated for years – as it was built not just in a different era (obviously), but for a different use – it had been designed for doctors and dentists in office suites – in fact, I remember many years ago finding old X-rays in a back closet.

To be fair – when I first entered the building in 1976, its usage state and efficiency quotient were not in my thoughts.

Honestly, I was awed, overwhelmed, intimidated by the sheer energy and power that radiated from the place…to me it was a mecca…I was drawn to it like a magnet. It was the only place I wanted to be.

Yet as time passed and needs changed and changed again and again – as we realized that the structure itself could not support our growth and the future as we envisioned it – we decided to move, and move we did.

All of which leads me to the notion of legacy…the past and the future.

My loyal readers know that I have no patience and little respect for people who throw out the past…who claim to learn nothing from what was…who put little or no value (at least publicly) on bringing the knowledge and wisdom of preceding generations to bear on their doings…who posture that what they do is ex nihilo – sprung out of their fertile creativity – new and unsullied by the ancients.

Needless to say their vision of the future is equally flawed – as they assume that they will not fall into the “long-ago” category, as what they are creating is forever….

By the way – I love the way the retro style in fashion and design plays to that audience…another Ramble perhaps….but a joke nevertheless.

So here I am, obsessed with legacy…excited by my new digs…wondering what they will mean 87 years hence….

And then I read the following…listen:

“We are a continuum. Just as we reach back to our ancestors for our fundamental values, so we, as guardians of that legacy, must reach ahead to our children and their children. And we do so with a sense of sacredness in that reaching.” Paul Tsongas

We are a continuum…I love that thought. We are on a journey that has no end…we are a product of the past that was and the future that will be…legacy is not a stagnant pool of water…legacy is not an artifact in a museum or a historical oddity….

Legacy is a living and breathing thing. Legacy is what we build on and pass on to the next generation and the next…we learn and create seamlessly…changing and molding and evolving and transforming as we grow and move on….

Without Gutenberg there would be no Internet…understand that and you get my view of legacy.

If you think of Gutenberg as analog and us as digital, you are limiting what we can achieve…as many do.

But if you think of Gutenberg as the revolution of widespread sharing and the resultant desire for knowledge – and the Internet as a logical and critical step in that revolution – then the possibilities are endless and go way beyond the next gamification strategy to make a few investors rich.

This week begins our next cycle – we will continue to build our legacy as I hope 87 years from now our successors will as well.

Legacy is yours and yours alone – make it so….

What do you think?