Archive for the ‘Questions’ Category

Monday, June 3rd, 2013

This Little Piggy Went to Market…

Actually – many little piggies – not clear if they went to market themselves…but it is clear that they represent almost $5 billion to an American meat processing company from their Chinese counterpart. Bottom line – China has been plagued with substandard food processing issues; way too many people have died; if you have seen the gruesome photo of 16,000 dead pigs in the Huangpu River, the deal and its scope is clear; some feel the deal might be a national security risk to the United States; Smithfield Foods, the company in question, clearly doesn’t think it is; China continues to be viewed with suspicion in many quarters; Congress…Heaven help us…specifically the Committee on Foreign Investment will decide….

Back in the last century when Japan was the 800-pound investment gorilla that kept some Americans up at night, a law was passed that gave the President power to stop or unravel any acquisition of a US company by a “foreign” entity when “credible evidence” existed that a “foreign interest exercising control might take action that threatens to impair the national security,” and while the power seems to be with the President, it’s the committee that really calls the shots.

Hard to imagine how the purchase of a pork processor could “impair the national security” – but there seem to be a number of areas of concern…for example does Smithfield supply the Army or the CIA or other security agency with pork? Or might the Chinese learn how to use the superior pig raising technology and skills of Smithfield and run with it back to China, or worse, might the Chinese be in a position to disrupt the supply of pork to the Unites States, forcing us all to choose a Kosher or Halal lifestyle or at its extreme – if they really killed the supply chain – to become vegetarians?

The deal is big and more importantly has a huge impact on the many companies in the supply chain to Smithfield who will all benefit as the business grows and grows and grows – both in the US and one imagines in China as they learn how to apply the knowledge and wisdom they will buy and finally fix their own home.

Put this into context with Google, Facebook, Twitter and others trying to get a toehold in China and think about the uproar of censorship, self and imposed, that surrounded those efforts and think about the concerns that have been raised about Alibaba looking the other way – seeking to compete outside of China.

All adds up to lots of sleepless nights in the West….

Yet – despite my fascination with this possible transaction (I hope it goes through) my real purpose in highlighting it was because it entered my consciousness on the heels of the terrible tragedy at the LDA Plaza Building in Pakistan that killed eight people.

To me, the contrast could not be starker. In pursuit of cheaper labor (read more profit margin) we don’t think to apply the same rule of law that governs workers in the West or even demand that local laws – as weak and shallow as they might be – be adhered to nor, to be fair, do consumers offer to pay more for those products that they get on the cheap. Yet when the money flows the other way we get protective and reactionary.

So in a world where Asian products are winning at every turn, there is concern about helping China fix its food problem because national security might be compromised and, yes, too bad about all those people in Pakistan.

What are we thinking? Time for Generation World to flex its off-line muscle beyond buying the same products and start fixing the world. To me, these stories show how linked we are; how interconnected our economies are – yet how disconnected we seem to be as people.

Listen:

“This little piggy went to market, this little piggy went home, this little piggy had roast beef and this little piggy had none…and this little piggy cried weeweewee all the way home…”

Children’s Nursery Rhyme

Way too many people – around the world – are crying weeweewee…and some never make it home…it’s a wake-up call….

Follow both stories to their conclusions and see where you net out….

PS – China is also wary of outside investment…HMMMMM.…

What do you think?

 

 

Monday, May 13th, 2013

Bald Cats, Putin, Homer and Algorithms

“Read Homer’s The Iliad and The Odyssey and try and figure out why they’re still being read, searched for, turned into movies or (digibabble) digital video content.”

The above was my reply to a question I was asked on a recent panel about what young creative types should do today to better prepare themselves for success in our world. And, while it might seem a bit facetious…it’s not meant to be – not in the slightest.  Frankly, if you think the answer is to learn social media/technology, you will fail – unless you understand why people share and why it is that some things share better than others.

BuzzFeed, for example, can talk all they want about their algorithm, but at the end of the day their young and savvy editors find the cat pictures, create the lists and recognize the news items they instinctively know will zoom from person to person – which in my book makes them that much more powerful and a true example of Digital Exponential, and that is the point.

Yet, sadly, it’s still only the holy algorithm that analysts and the digibablers want to worship. Because in their zeal to monetize, just how exciting is a story about hungry-smart editors versus the grail search for software that eliminates the human element?

The joke is that they abandon the latest greatest for the next as soon as the quarterly earnings don’t match their initial rave predictions, and of course Facebook, Groupon and LinkedIn are casualties of this fickle market – although while Facebook and LinkedIn are real, Groupon was a complete fabrication of the digibable financial set who perhaps one day will be called to task for misleading the public.

And more and more, the market leaders are turning to the need for human insight and interaction in order to better their products – sales – and earnings.

Bottom line – learn – learn from the greats. Don’t fall into the conceit that the fabulous technology we have today has created a revolution in human behavior.  Understand, rather, that it’s an amazing evolution in terms of what we can do and achieve in leveraging and enhancing exponentially our core human values and needs.

I share with you a conversation between Rudyard Kipling and Mark Twain (two of my favorites) that took place in Elmira, New York, in June of 1889.

“The two men discuss the difficulties of copyright before moving on to Twain’s work. ‘Growing bold, and feeling that I had a few hundred thousand folk at my back, I demanded whether Tom Sawyer married Judge Thatcher’s daughter and whether we were ever going to hear of Tom Sawyer as a man.’

Twain gets up, fills his pipe, and paces the room in his bedroom slippers. ‘I haven’t decided. I have a notion of writing the sequel to Tom Sawyer in two ways. In one I would make him rise to great honor and go to Congress, and in the other I should hang him. Then the friends and enemies of the book could take their choice.’

Kipling raises a voice of protest: to him, Tom Sawyer is real.”

Source: Hello/Goodbye/Hello by Craig Brown

This conversation could have happened today – copyright issues, crowd sourcing, social media extensions…but it didn’t and that is the point.

But allow me to end with Kipling’s final thought, which I believe brings us back to Homer, The Bible…all the great and living ideas and thoughts that will last way after the latest iteration of Bald Cats that look like Putin will be gone and forgotten…and by the way, I’m not knocking that—just making a point….

Listen:

“‘Yes; but don’t give him two joggles and show the result, because he isn’t your property any more. He belongs to us.’” Kipling to Twain

And there you have it…it always belongs to us – once the genie leaves the bottle, it can never be put back in. And that is the secret – not the software, not the technology, not all the digibable in the world….

So Bing Homer (the original, not Simpson) – and ask yourself why – and by the way, spend a few minutes with Twain and Kipling too.

What do you think?

 

Monday, May 6th, 2013

The Race to be Wrong — Is it Right??

reddit, its (r)editors and “old-fashioned” media channels all took negative hits during the recent tragic Boston bombing and its frantic aftermath.

Interestingly enough, if you cut through the digibabble and pontificating punditry, the issue is actually the same – the need we have to provide the scoop – to be the first – to have the 15 minutes or 15mgs of fame as the source of information that everyone wants but no one yet knows.

Some would say that the CNN and other broadcast news problem is the need to fill 24 hours of airtime with meaningful content – while the digital issue is how to verify the source when torrents of information assault the system.

Stay with me here – cut through the crap and there is no difference. In both instances we have a need to communicate, a need to share, a need to be first, a need to own what no one else has.

In both instances – unverified information from sketchy sources caused bad, wrong, invalid and in some instances hurtful information to be shared. In both instances we distributed “onwards misinformation” – WOM – digital and analog perpetuated the problem and in the end – an old guy who noticed blood on his boat cracked the case.

Bottom line – the power of digital communication and digital sharing is akin to wearing Iron Man’s power suit. It takes our human need and behavior…exponentially increases it, and at its best opens up new and exciting opportunities for problem solving – in fact, that is the true promise of reddit – and it works.

The mistake is to think that the reddit blow up in any way denigrates what they can do or that the mindless chatter we saw on CNN and other broadcast channels in any way denigrates what they do. (Jon Stewart’s take on this is a must see.)

And finally, read up on Dewey-Truman – you know my view – connecting the dots backwards propels us forwards….

At the end of the day…no one person or channel or anything has a total and complete lock on veracity…listen:

“No one can be right all of the time, but it helps to be right most of the time.”
Robert Half

And there you have it. We need to stop making excuses.  Lose the digibabble and figure out how to better vet our incredibly expanded and expanding range of sources. If we don’t? Dewey-Truman will haunt us – exponentially….

What do you think?

 

 

  • Following the thread from Graham, Reuters pursue the mantra 'fastest and most accurate', but following this mantra lead them to be swamped by Bloomberg and other news sources who provide 'opinion', which is taking the facts plus the journalists POV to deliver more column inches, therefore publishing slanted coverage, which can easily become inaccurate as a story breaks and morphs ...
  • BBC News and Journalism were an old client of mine and pride themselves on being the news source that will only publish a news piece once it has been validated by three separate sources. It let Sky News own the 'fastest' position but for a public service striving to deliver 'World Class Journalism' integrity of the story outweighed speed ...