Archive for the ‘Culture’ Category

Monday, June 13th, 2011

What Is An Idea?

What is an idea?

Seriously – what is an idea?

And when does an idea cross the road and become more – something real, tangible, useful, valuable – you get the picture.

I ask – out of all seriousness – having just read a piece in Tech Dirt that looks at ideas vs. intellectual property (IP):

The impetus for the question and their look at it is a web site called http://ideasmatter.com that has been created by Philips, Microsoft and DSM in an effort to better define the need for protecting IP.

Their manifesto states:

“Ideas Matter is a consortium of cross-sector enterprises, small and medium-sized businesses and trade associations that aims to expand awareness and promote the benefits of intellectual property (IP). We firmly believe that IP—and the ideas that lie underneath them—are important to the economy, important to society, important to companies both large and small. In other words, Ideas Matter.”

Listen to the language carefully: “…IP and the ideas that lie underneath them…”

The manifesto goes on to say:

“Despite its importance, intellectual property (which includes patents, design rights, trademarks, domain names and copyrights) remains a complex and often misunderstood topic.”

Again – listen carefully: IP “remains a complex and often misunderstood topic.”

Notice it doesn’t suggest that ideas are a misunderstood topic…HMMMMM.

Thought we might begin by looking at definitions – and there are no lack of them.

IDEA — noun

1. Any conception existing in the mind as a result of mental understanding, awareness, or activity.

2. A thought, conception, or notion: That is an excellent idea.

3. An impression: He gave me a general idea of how he plans to run the department.

4. An opinion, view, or belief: His ideas on raising children are certainly strange.

5. A plan of action; an intention: the idea of becoming an engineer.

6. A groundless supposition; fantasy.

Bottom line – its all in the mind; all in the realm of imagination; all speculative – and despite its being a noun, not real.

Now let’s look at the definition of Intellectual Property also a noun:

Property from original thought protected by law: original creative work manifested in a tangible form that can be legally protected, e.g. by a patent, trademark, or copyright”

See the big difference?

IP is tangible – it’s real – its 3D – it can be touched and felt; it’s material and physical – you get the point.

And, as such, it can be and should be protected. In fact, it is – IP is not open source – it is not “free fishing” – and I personally am a huge believer in fully applying the law to real IP.   

For example I won’t use bootleg downloads of music; books; movies – whatever – not only because I believe it’s a moral and ethical issue – but because I believe that if we don’t pay for great stuff, great stuff won’t happen – and frankly – I don’t know about you – but the thought of having to watch hours of stupid video vs. one Lord of The Rings – is frankly depressing.

And – to be really clear the notion that the Digital world is built on giving it away for free is no different than it was when Print was invented, or recordings – the debates raged – but lucky for us and global culture and knowledge – the safeguards were put in place.

We all know the famous verse from Ecclesiastes: “There is nothing new under the sun.”  And the notion that there are only really seven basic plots in all literature — a contested number to be sure, but all agree that there is a limit.

So imagine if Steven Spielberg got sued by the original Anglo-Saxon author of Beowulf – for “idea” infringement on the similarities between Jaws and Grendel. I guess lucky for Steven the author isn’t known and lived in the 700s.

So there you have it. Did the Winklevoss have a case against Zuckerberg? Do we think that ideas and IP are separate and distinct? Should everything be free?

Found this great thought – listen

“A revolution is an idea which has found its bayonets.”
Napoleon Bonaparte

And maybe therein lies the answer.

IP is an idea which has found its bayonets…..

How do you feel?

Do you download bootleg?

Do you think there is a difference between an idea and IP?

These are critical issues that I do believe affect the development of the future of great ideas and powerful IP.

Final thought – the Internet was created to share scientific knowledge…….

Share your thoughts – ideas…..

PS – I was going to write about the nexus of privacy; bad taste; public trust and pure sheer piggishnessthe story of Anthony Weiner will have to wait….

  • Digital is not always free -- and in the future possibly even less so. Soemone pays -- somehow. It is my view that the printing press was actually the revolution and that all that follows is an evolution -- the revolution being the possibility to share information -- not hoard it as had been the case in most of the ...
  • Really dont agree that the digital world is no different than when Print was invented. The main difference is that digital is instantaneous and free, when print was invented it was for a much narrower audience (remember most couldnt read) and was only available to those who could afford education. even today print is not available for free in many ...
  • Maybe the answer starts with a question: Is all ideas equal? Sharing basic ideas on facebook about your cheese burger is equal to sharing breakthrough idea on the world or on a new product? Or idea about love? Or song or software. The Internet allows for the first time for all ideas to be published. is all ideas equal in ...
Monday, June 6th, 2011

With Internet Blocked…

With Internet Blocked, Protesters Are Still Able to Mobilize….

So reads a news headline from The New York Times on Saturday, June 4, 2011. The Italics are mine…

The reference is to Syria and the ongoing repression by that brutal regime. But this is not about politics – it’s about human behavior and the almost stupid lack of even basic understanding of how it’s people who drive the use of technology and more so push it into directions that the obtuse analysts of our age never even imagined.

Imagine that – they were able to mobilize with the Internet. GMOOT – Give Me One of Those revolutions…

The press and such were so caught up with the already legendary Arab Spring and its use of Facebook, Twitter and the like that I imagine it’s inconceivable to them that people can communicate any other way. Let alone figure out how to rally together, organize and assemble.

Makes me wonder how on that momentous July 14th in 1789 the rumors in Paris managed to spread such that a crowd at least 3x times the expected showed up at the Bastille – not to mention the guards who defected and joined them. Imagine that! Did the headline the next day read – “With no digital communication at all – seeing as how it had not yet been invented – the French Revolution began…”

Or what about that fateful June 15th in Odessa, Russia, when in less than 4 hours thousands of Odessans gathered on the steps made famous in the movie Potemkin (the massacre depicted never actually happened, but that montage sequence inspired the famous Baptism scene in the Godfather) and made the Russian Revolution a reality – how did the participants know to gather? In fact, how did they know where to go? Have we missed the early origins of tweeting?

In fact, we have! And worse – way too many continue to do so in pursuit of GMOOT thinking.

What we are missing is the human need that drives it all. It only took a month for half of all Harvard undergraduates to join Thefacebook.com – the first rendition of today’s largest global social network. The lightening speed adoption was because Zuckerberg understood – clearly he understood – the deep need, desire, drive we all have to share and the baked-in-our-DNA behavioral triggers associated with that need. Facebook works because we have human needs – not because the technology application evolved us into a new form of life.

So when I see headlines like “Are Still Able to Mobilize,” I worry – I worry for our humanity and just as much I worry for our technology – because without the two intertwined, neither will get as far as they should. And both will suffer.

Seems to me that as we lurch about listening to so-called experts in social digital communications and the like, we are emulating the following – listen:

“I know a lot about cars. I can look at a car’s headlights and tell you exactly which way it’s coming”. Mitch Hedberg

If we are going to take advantage of the true power of the Internet – blocked or not – we had better do better than merely looking at the “headlights.”

And one more thing…

Check out Instagram – a new app for the iPhone (so far only iPhone) –  one of a new group of apps that are about “the Social Web embracing sharing of moments.”

Glad it’s the social Web driving that behavior…

Now check out the Kodak Brownie – and go back further to Ancient Egypt and the development of papyrus…

Want to hear from you!!!

Monday, May 30th, 2011

How Could Opportunities…

How could Opportunities be insurmountable?

Frankly I don’t believe problems and issues are ever insurmountable…but there you have it – if a word like insurmountable exists – it’s because people use it – so while I’d personally like to have it stricken from the human language experience…I don’t think…whoops…I just got caught in the insurmountable trap…see??

It’s an easy trap to fall into – in fact, although I haven’t done any serious statistical testing – I’d bet that it’s just as easy to infect a group with depressing; downbeat and pessimistic force – The Darkside for those Star Wars fans like myself – as it is to pump them up with positive energy and power – The Force….

You have all seen it – I’m sure. History is full of examples. The shift in perception; the dangerous skew towards harmful behavior; the sudden mood swing of the group – I think you get it.

On the other hand – I know you have seen the opposite. The ability of positive energy and up-beat evangelism to alter negative group think and to change outcomes by the sheer will power of an activist group focused on changing the world – or at least the small portion of the world they represent.

So why then are Opportunities often viewed as Insurmountable?

Listen:

“We have been taught to believe that negative equals realistic and positive equals unrealistic.” Susan Jeffers

Now you know.

As long as we have our wires crossed and mix up the basic physics of getting things done; moving forward; changing the status quo…you get the point…we will be afraid of opportunities…

The solution is clear – align our language – Positive only means moving forward – Negative only means moving back….simple fix…simple solution.

So Opportunities are only to be celebrated and grabbed with the understanding that they are all occasions for success and greatness.

And the word Insurmountable needs to be relegated to the Darkside – we know it’s there – but we know we can fight it – beat it and not get seduced by its false allure.

So which is it?

The Force or The Darkside?

And May the Force be with You – just in case you weren’t sure where I stood…

And you?