Archive for May, 2012

Monday, May 28th, 2012

More on Facebook

More on Facebook.

Or should I say more on friends and friendship.

A week after the IPO – maybe one of the more contentious – not just biggest in the history of Wall Street – fingers are being pointed – every which way; lawsuits are being filed; the second guessers are second guessing and other than those who got rich no one seems particularly happy. Read more on this here.

One of the most ironic centers of blame – if you will – is the computer system at Nasdaq…which was inundated with orders and cancellations – and that some at Facebook blame for its lackluster performance – however Nasdaq swears it had no impact on the trading price of the shares – but imagine that – a computer system being blamed in the age of digital….do wonders never cease!

So what can we learn? Not just about the way markets work – but about ourselves and our world…

Number one – it seems to me – Facebook didn’t really know who their friends were. They assumed that having a billion people on their platform created one big like and that one big like would have an exponential effect on their stock price…HMMMMM

As people; as marketers; as friends – we should all know better by now. A mili-second click on a thumbs up does not a friend make – remember my question from last week – one thousand friends and who will pick you up at the airport.

So Facebook learned you can claim friendship of all or too all but in the end…listen:

“A friend to all is a friend to none.”
Aristotle

Old wisdom – but true and note to self – understanding that is what makes relationships real.

Beyond that lesson I’d say there was at least one more and when I saw the following quote I wasn’t sure if I should laugh or cry at its simple truth – particularly as applied to Facebook…listen:

“Friendship and money: oil and water.”
Mario Puzo

LOL!!!! If nothing else describes the entire story around this epic IPO – Puzo of Godfather fame – nailed it right on the head!!!!!

If you don’t share…are you really my friend? THUMBS UP!!!!

What do you think?

 

Monday, May 14th, 2012

Between Us and Total Chaos

Lord of the Flies:  Sir William Golding’s epic novel of the relationship between human nature and society, and the breakdown that occurs when the safeguards that society creates to  protect itself start to crumble.

I first read the book in junior high school, as the waves created by 1960s American social change and protest began to crash into my consciousness. I came of age in a time when “law and order” bumped into personal freedom, and what would seem, at first glance – maybe – to be two very complementary concepts clashed as, at their extremes, one became an oversimplified icon of police-state thinking and the other became a caricature of lack of accountability and seriousness.

And the book resonated. Where was the middle ground? The sweet spot between the glue that held society together and the anarchy of doing whatever you wanted – more important, what would happen if the bonds loosened? What would I do? What would you do?

The real question – as I see it – relates to absolutes – primal imprints – do we need laws or does human nature automatically take over and self-correct, so that we stay centered and behave in a manner that separates us from our nonhuman neighbors. Do we become the very monsters we fear or do we transcend?

If you haven’t read the book, I highly recommend it and will leave you with this thought quoted from the manuscript – “Maybe there is a beast….maybe it’s only us.”

Maybe it’s only us – clearly there is enough proof in the past century and this one too, to suggest that way too often it is us – and sometimes us with laws to justify our actions…maybe the worst combination of law and order and anarchy – in fact, since the dawn of time such has been the case.

On a smaller scale, it’s evident in personal and business relationships when self takes precedence and “the end justifies the means” becomes the normative operating philosophy.

So again – the question is, what really stands between us and total chaos? Clearly laws alone don’t cut it – and in fact, can be perverted for evil as well.

Listen:

“Laws control the lesser man.  Right conduct controls the greater one.”  Chinese Proverb

And there you have it – right conduct – an absolute – a primal imprint – a filter by which to judge what we do, what we support, what we champion.

We need laws – for sure – but as we know, laws are easy to break or ignore or worse, enact for the wrong reasons.

The book ends – “I should have thought that a pack of British boys…would have been able to put up a better show than that.”

What kind of show will we put on?

What do you think?

  • Matt -- good point -- much has been written about those who follow a "higher being" and in the name of that deity kill those who dont accept it. Way too many examples -- past and present -- to mention.
  • I have to call shenanigans on the notion that man must look to a higher being for guidance with regard to 'right conduct'. One doesn't need a deity to contemplate philosophical issues (such as morality). . In relation to Goldings tale, the kids had been taught about 'right conduct' but hadnt really contemplated it, hence when there was no ...
  • Remember in the movie, “Goodfellas”, the day the FBI zoomed down on Ray Liotta’s character, Henry Hill? That day, Hill was on top of his game. He had all of everything in his pocket; all the plates were spinning. He was making a feast for his buddies with multiple pots of sauce, pasta, meatballs; you name it, on ...