To answer your question:
There's no consequences. Its like being a weather man, I can take a shot at what I think the future holds, say it with conviction and if I'm wrong, no sweat, I'll get another shot tomorrow. No one ever goes back and says, hey remember when we thought 'X' well we were way off and here's why. ...
Psychics don't make money out of the future. They make it out of gullible consumers.
Making the future - being strategic, prudent, bold and creative - there are a lot of people having a go at that. They don't all succeed. They don't get it right each step of the way. There are up against each other at times. But ...
I really thank to one who wrote this article. I have always been reading and writing texts like this in blogs. Also, I, as a daily writer, present my respects to everyone. I just watched videos like this in youtube. I research in all areas.
I think people must first research before writing....
Simulators are good for assessing scenarios and risk, and keeping damage down. They are as good as the assumptions that they are built from. They help maintain an edge.
One weakness of simulators in "war games" roles is that the lack the human element. It's hard to take them as seriously as the real think, and the adrenalin is different. But ...
I really thank to one who wrote this article. I have always been reading and writing texts like this in blogs. Also, I, as a daily writer, present my respects to everyone. I just watched videos like this in youtube. I research in all areas...
I think people must first research before writing...
That's a good question. My parents introduced me to the idea of thinking pretty early on. So it's probably their fault. Or maybe it was due to play. Or maybe trying to get what I wanted, and working out how. Curiosity? Paying attention? Competitive nature? The habit of thinking? Not trusting the \recipe book approach\?